District 4
PETE PIRSCH:
2315 Nelson’s Creek Drive,
68116. votepetepirsch.com. Criminal Prosecutor - City of Omaha. Married.
Appointed by Governor Johanns to Nebraska Crime Commission,
2003-present. Elected Trustee, S.I.D., 2005-present. Law Degree, U.N.L.;
M.B.A., U.N.O.; B.A.-Government, University Virginia. Volunteer Hours:
Boyscouts; Big Brothers (7 years); Omaha Jaycees (10 years, established
scholarships for Nebraska students); OBA Public Service Committee; Chamber
of Commerce YPC; Central Alumni Board; Frequently Speak at Schools.
TONY SORRENTINO:
Age 52. 13295 Cuming St.,
68154. votesorrentino2006.com. Principal, SilverStone Group. Married, 4
children. Creighton University (BSBA, 1976).
Creighton University School of Law (JD,
1981). Volunteer Hours: President, Nebraska Leukemia/Lymphoma Society;
Volunteer cross country coach, Marian High School.
District 6
LYNNE SARAFIAN
ANDERSON: Age 61. 6626 Cuming
St., 68132. LynneAnderson.com. Retired Nurse and small business owner
(self employed). Married, 2 children. I have a BSN and MSN from Emory
University in Atlanta, Ga. I have been active throughout my nursing career
in the Nebraska Nursing Assoc; serving for 2 terms as President in Dist II.
I served on Senator Bob Kerrey’s bi-partisan committee for Universal Health
Insurance, am currently a member (word limit exceeded)
JOHN E. NELSON:
6269 Glenwood Road, 68132.
www.electjohnnelson.com. Attorney-at-Law - self-employed, sole
practitioner. Married, 3 children. Chief Deputy Election Commissioner
(1972-1980). B.A., UNL; J.D., Creighton Law School. U.S. Navy & Naval
Reserve; Commander (SC) Ret. Volunteer Hours: Pro bono legal work, OBA--Lawyer
Referral: 3-5 hours quarterly, Church Choir--4+ hours weekly; Church
Boards – 5 hours monthly, Omaha Presbyterian Seminary Foundation—6-8 hours
quarterly.
District 8
MARC KRAFT:
Age 58. 601 North 51, 68132.
Vote4Kraft.com. Owner/Operator Kraft Furniture. Married, 4 children. Omaha
City Countil 1997-2005. BS in Math Creighton University. Volunteer Hours:
With Youth groups, Cosmopolitan Club of Omaha; Whenever possible.
TOM WHITE:
Age 49. 2517 N. 55th Street, 68104.
www.Whiteforlegislature.com. Attorney - White Wulff and Jorgensen Law
Offices. Married, 2 children. JD -Creighton University School of Law
1983, BA History and Philosophy --Regis University 1979. Volunteer Hours:
Pro bono legal services for civil rights groups, Nebraska Horse
Association, Trail preparation, 4-H.
District 10
MIKE FRIEND:
Age: 44. 4722 N. 81 St., 68134. Incumbent. Bus. Analyst - First National
Bank. Married, 4 children. Nebraska Legislature 2005-2006. Creighton Univ,
BZ.
ROBERT WIMBERLEY:
Age 24. 3615 North 113th Court,
#5, 68164. www.vote4robw.com. Fundraising Consultant - Self-employed.
Single, no children. UC Berkeley, BA in Political Science, BA in French.
Volunteer Hours: Saturday mornings at the public library.
District 12
STEVE LATHROP:
Age 48. 11818 Oakair Plaza,
68137. www.lathropforlegislature.com.
Attorney - Hauptman, O’Brien, Wolf & Lathrop. Divorced, 4 Children.
Graduated from Creighton University Business College in
1979 and the School of Law in 1981. Since 1989 a partner at Hauptman,
O’Brien. Past president of the Nebraska Association of Trial Attorneys.
Volunteer activities include St. Gerald’s Men’s Club, RGSA, Mary Our Queen
soccer and Nebraska Volunteer Lawyers Project, representing indigent
Nebraskans.
JEAN STOTHERT:
Age 52. 5909 South 118th Plz.,
68137. www.stothertforlegislature.com. R.N., Volunteer. Married, 2
children. Bd of Ed, Millard Public School: 2004-present; currently Vice
President. Bd of Ed, Millard Public Schools; elected 1998, 2000, 2004;
President 2003-2004. B.S. Nursing—Seattle Pacific Univ. Volunteer Hours:
Univ Hospital Auxiliary; Faculty Women’s Club—UNMC; Project Extra Mile;
Metro Area Boards of Education; Nebraska Assoc. School Boards; Nebraska
Nurses Assoc; All Saints Episcopal Church.
District 18
MICK MINES:
Age 56.
www.mickmines.com.
Incumbent. Vice President, HunTel Systems. Married, 2 children. Nebraska
Legislature – 2003 to present. Mayor of Blair – 1994 to 2002. United
States Naval Reserve Corp – E3. Blair Rotary Club – weekly.
SCOTT R. YAHNKE:
Age 55. 4414 N. 156 Ave Cir.
68116. scottyahnke.com. Occupation Realtor, CBS Home Real Estate Co.
Married, 4 children. Trustee, S.I.D. 375 (Walnut Ridge subdivision),
2002-present. B.A., UNL, 1973; graduate studies in economics & urban
education. Volunteer Hours: I serve on S.I.D. 375 on an unpaid, voluntary,
elected basis.
District 20
BRAD ASHFORD:
Age 56. 7926 Shirley St.,
68124. www.bradashford.com. Exec Dir-OHA. Married, 3 children. Omaha
Housing Authority Exec. Dir. 2004 to present; Board member—MECA (Qwest
Center). Past Offices: Judge—Commission of Industrial Relations; State
Senator 1987-1995; Chairman, OHA Board. Colgate Univ, BA, Phi Beta Kapa
1971; Creighton Univ School of Law. Volunteer Hours: 15-20 Community based
nonprofits and MECA (Qwest Center) board.
CAROL CASEY:
2506 S. 105 Ave. 68124.
www.carolcaseyforlegislature.com. Self employed Management Consultant &
licensed P&C Insurance Agent/Broker. Married, 9 children. Metro Tech –
Assoc. Cert. in Landscape Design ’70; Randall School of Real Estate;
numerous insurance, loss control and finance courses. Volunteer Hours:
Current board member of the following non-profits: National Safety Council,
Rockbrook Women’s Wellness, Christ the King Parish Council, Mercy High
School – Have volunteered regularly for many years.
1. How can the
state provide property tax relief while still maintaining essential programs
and services?
District 4
PIRSCH:
As a homeowner with experience running a
family business, my mission is to lower property taxes. We can deliver
essential services by reducing wasteful spending and efficiencies through
technology and shared services. We should increase sales revenue from
non-Nebraskans through tourism, etc. Unfunded mandates to localities should
be reduced.
SORRENTINO:
A thorough review of the public
education budget (for which property taxes provide the majority of funding)
is necessary. Steps to encourage economic growth will provide a greater
base from which to extract revenue. Consider alternative sources of revenue
for education expenses.
District 6
ANDERSON:
A luxury sales tax on non essential
items i.e. perfume, jewelry, candy, etc could ease the property tax burden.
NELSON:
To decrease property taxes, the state
must provide more funding for public schools. This will require decreased
spending on costly Corrections and Medicaid programs. This can be achieved
by providing incentives for home-based and assisted living, and reducing
prison population through creative alternative sentencing for non-violent
offenders.
District 8
KRAFT:
If we broaden the homestead exemption
and allow an across the board $25,000 exemption for the first $25,000 of
valuation we can make property taxes more progressive. We must also make
sure funds are allocated properly to those services most deserving. With
proper oversight and preventative maintenance we can save money.
WHITE:
There are a number of ways in which the
state can provide property tax relief. These include: transferring some of
the burden to other sources of revenue, increasing the homestead exemption,
encouraging new industries and growth that would expand our tax base and
create new jobs, and auditing all taxing (word limit exceeded)
District 10
FRIEND:
A) Tax
relief drives economic growth. Overall, economic growth makes our tax
system more efficient and effective. B) We can always prioritize and look
to cut or streamline in areas of non-essential services. C) Privitization
of many government functions needs to be addressed—continually.
WIMBERLEY:
We need to look at our current tax
incentives and bring them up to date with our current economic status. I
believe too many corporations are getting a free ride at the expense of
Nebraska’s taxpayers.
District 12
LATHROP:
In order to provide property tax relief,
it is essential that Nebraska increase its tax base. This requires that the
State provide incentives to Nebraska businesses to expand and to outside
businesses that will bring good paying jobs to Nebraska. Additional jobs
will improve our economy and provide additional tax revenues.
STOTHERT:
The best way to provide property tax
relief is to prioritize spending, cut waste and grow the economy. To truly
relieve the tax burden, tax cuts must be sustainable. My goals are to focus
on spending restraint and to increase efficiency and accountability in state
government.
District 18
MINES:
Property taxes are set by and for local
government, i.e., K-12, cities, counties, etc. State aid to local
government merely shifts cost to sales and income taxes and does not fix
Nebraska’s status of a high-tax state. Only through merger and
consolidation of local government can we reduce taxes.
YAHNKE:
I support a performance review of all
state agencies, as well as programs, which receive state funding in order to
determine the basis for tax relief. Human needs should come ahead of
programs funded as a result of the influence of special interests. Also, we
should look at ways to downsize (word limit exceeded)
District 20
ASHFORD:
Property tax relief is a product of
efficiency in government service on the local level, with reasonable and
prudent appropriations of state aid.
CASEY:
Primary resource for funding education
in Nebraska should be sales and income tax, not property tax. It would be a
more fair and equitable way of funding. Shift the source of revenues and
shift the costs accordingly. Essential programs and services can be
maintained.
2. Would you
support a change in Nebraska law that would allow social workers rather than
law enforcement to determine whether children should be removed from homes
where there is an allegation of child abuse or neglect? Why or why not?
District 4
PIRSCH:
As a Criminal Prosecutor, I have
handled hundreds of child abuse cases. Children represent the future of
Nebraska: we can’t let one fall through the cracks. Both social workers and
law enforcement should be able to remove children from grave and immediate
danger with good cause and legal guidance.
SORRENTINO:
The determination as to whether a
crime has been committed should not be delegated to social workers, in place
of law enforcement officials. Social workers should be incorporated into
the process of dealing with the resolution of family issues if neglect or
abuse is alleged.
District 6
ANDERSON:
Social workers are the better
alternative due to their education; however, police officers should retain
the responsibility if a social worker is not immediately available and the
child’s life or health is at risk.
NELSON:
The welfare of children is paramount;
I would consider supporting change which allows social workers to make this
determination. Their training and experience should enable them to evaluate
whether the allegation of abuse or neglect is valid. However, law
enforcement officers should still be allowed to make such a determination.
District 8
KRAFT:
Yes, provided that the law is properly
written so that law enforcement can still take care of the emergencies and
that trained, knowledgeable social workers are called in within a very short
time frame. Sometimes there is need for immediate action. Law enforcement
and Social Workers need to work together.
WHITE:
No, not until evidence of sufficient
training and standards are in place.
District 10
FRIEND:
* This
needs to be a situation where law enforcement and social services work
collaboratively. *Both organizations have a wealth of experience in dealing
with these issues. This should be looked at as a positive—organizations
working together with the child’s best interest at the forefront.
WIMBERLEY:
Social workers and law enforcement alike
have a child’s best interest at heart. Neither side should have a sole
say. Law enforcement needs to maintain its ability to make an immediate
on-site decision to act promptly for the child’s welfare.
District 12
LATHROP:
I support a change in the law which
would have trained social workers primarily responsible for the decision to
remove children from a home. Any change in the law must still permit law
enforcement to remove a child where the child’s safety is an immediate
concern.
STOTHERT:
I support a partnership between social
workers and law enforcement. Recognizing that many of these situations are
dangerous, my top priority would be assuring the safety of the child and the
social worker.
District 18
MINES:
Yes, if those social workers who
determine the fate of children are properly trained and held accountable in
statute.
YAHNKE:
Either or both law enforcement and
social workers should be allowed to determine whether a child should be
removed.
District 20
ASHFORD:
Law enforcement must be first line of
defense against child abuse. Social workers perform an essential role but
not without the active involvement of law enforcement.
CASEY:
I would support it. Social workers are
trained to judge the situation and needs. Law enforcement and social
workers should work together, providing expertise in assessing situations
and enforcement support to implement necessary protection.
3. What role
should the state play in providing equitable funding and resources for all
public school students in Nebraska?
District 4
PIRSCH:
Education is extremely important. The
state should play a leading role ensuring equitable funding for all
students, regardless of school district attendance. Everyone’s interest is
served when all children have the opportunity to obtain a quality
education. Our children are the next generation of workers and leaders in
Nebraska.
SORRENTINO:
The Nebraska Constitution calls
for the State to fund public education from the K-12 level. A balancing of
State provided funds and personal property taxes is necessary for equitable
funding, along with consideration for “extraordinary” expenses for certain
school students.
District 6
ANDERSON:
The state should provide funding and
resources to all public schools in Ne in order to provide an equitable
learning experience.
NELSON:
The state legislature should find a
better way of funding our public schools. This may require complete
revamping of our tax structure. The state must insure that funds are
properly allocated to meet higher costs of districts with special needs
programs and/or large minority student concentrations.
District 8
KRAFT:
All our children, regardless of where
they live or their economic status, deserve a quality education. The state
should make sure that this happens regardless of the special needs and
financial difficulties a city or school district may be facing. By providing
quality education we plan for the future.
WHITE:
The state must play a pivotal role
because the Constitution places the burden of providing an appropriate
education on the state government, not on local governmental subdivisions.
We must change the state aid to education formula to make schools less
reliant on property taxes.
District 10
MIKE FRIEND:
* A
solid role. I believe we are constitutionally mandated to provide equitable
funding. * We should also, as taxpayers, be able to expect, and demand,
results that can be effectively measured.
WIMBERLEY:
The state needs to increase its share of
public school funding from only 37% to closer to 50%. The state also needs
to take into consideration the needs of schools, such as special education,
second language learning and AP classes.
District 12
LATHROP:
While I opposed the OPS attempt to take
over the patrons of the Ralston and Millard School Districts, it is
important that all children, regardless of where they live, receive the same
high quality education. The State must continue to provide aid to school
districts to equalize resources among districts.
STOTHERT:
The Legislature is responsible to see
that school funding is fair; not only to the students, but also to the
taxpayers and that funds are adequate and equitable and guarantee a high
quality education. This is done through a combination of state and local
revenue sources.
District 18
MINES:
Nebraska’s state aid formula does
provide equitable funding
YAHNKE:
If an Omaha-area learning community is
to come completely to fruition, careful attention needs to be paid to ensure
allocation of funding to all entities involved. Also, no matter where a
child attends school in Nebraska, every child should have the opportunity to
obtain a quality education. Therefore, the (word limit exceeded)
District 20
ASHFORD:
State has for 20 years made significant
contributions to funding public schools. This commitment should continue
based on factors of need established by experts and citizens in a
collaborative environment.
CASEY:
The State Legislature has the
responsibility for providing funding and resources to educate all persons
between the ages of five and twenty-one years, mandated by the state’s
constitution. The school finance system must be fair and adequate.
Disparities among schools and funding exist and must be eliminated.
4.
Do you favor using state
general funds to reimburse irrigators for not irrigating, asking irrigators
to pay a conservation fee to help mitigate costs of regulation, or some
other way to fund the cost of managing and preserving Nebraska's water
supply? Explain.
District 4
PIRSCH:
I oppose using state general funds in a
way that will lead to tax increases for Nebraskans. However, the state has
not historically properly regulated water usage, and the state will have to
play a role in solving the present problem so that our agricultural economy
is not harmed.
SORRENTINO:
Nebraska’s water supply is a
Statewide concern, not just a rural Nebraska concern. A conservation fee
for irrigators may be prudent if not punitive in amount, however, the State
must play a role in preserving the water supply as well.
District 6
ANDERSON:
Managing Nebraska’s water supply is a
shared responsibility for all residents of our state in coordination with
those whose livelihood depends on irrigation. Professors at UNL have plants
that use less water and are more productive for the production of ethanol.
I support research and transition to less water intense crops.
NELSON:
I believe we need a combination which
compensates farmers who agree not to irrigate and requires that those who do
irrigate pay a conservation fee. Preserving our state’s water supply and
our farm economy is essential, so all Nebraska taxpayers should contribute
toward these future costs.
District 8
KRAFT:
Our farm community makes up a large
percentage of our state economy. There is not one right solution. The
solution will be by compromise in the legislature that will probably call
for a combination of some contribution for the general fund, some irrigation
fees and other funds.
WHITE:
The State mishandled the negotiation of
the water compacts in the first instance, and then further mishandled the
resolution of the lawsuits brought to enforce those compacts, thereby
placing an inequitable hardship on farmers. In fairness the State must
participate in alleviating that hardship. It’s important that we bring
people together (word limit exceeded)
District 10
FRIEND: Haven’t
come to a determination yet. *I will not support reimbursing irrigators
with gen. fund money.
WIMBERLEY: I don’t like the idea of paying people for not doing their jobs. I
believe a conservation fee will provide a beneficial yet short-term
solution. We need a long-term solution that won’t be another burden left
for our children.
District 12
LATHROP:
I would be reluctant to use state
general funds to pay irrigators not to irrigate. The primary cost of the
water used by irrigators should be shouldered by those who use this natural
resource.
STOTHERT:
Water is an important state asset and
plays a vital role in our economy. I support economic incentives to
encourage stewardship of the resources by individual land owners. I believe
effective, efficient use and management of water will produce sustainable
social, economic and environmental benefits.
District 18
MINES:
I could support a plan whereby
irrigator’s wells are metered and they pay for the water they use.
YAHNKE:
I think that, in the long range, we will
regret that folks have expanded row crop agriculture into the sandhills. I
thought we may have learned from the experiences of those who tried to
homestead in the sandhills in the 1800’s, only to learn that one needs his
own source (word limit exceeded)
District 20
ASHFORD:
All of the above should be considered.
We must have a timely plan for allocation of water resources which includes
all 93 counties. Urban areas must be part of the solution and citizens in
the eastern part of the state must better educated on the options.
CASEY:
I am not familiar enough with this
issue to give a thorough answer. I am open to listening to and weighing
pros and cons.
Back to Top